|
Manhattan(1979)
Cast:Woody Allen (Isaac), Diane Keaton (Mary), Michael
Murphy (Yale), Mariel Hemingway (Tracy), Meryl Streep
(Jill), Anne Byrne (Emily), Karen Ludwig (Connie), Michael
O'Donoghue (Dennis), Damion Sheller (Ike's Son), Wallace
Shawn (Jeremiah), Mark Linn-Baker (Shakespearean Actor),
Frances Conroy (Shakespearean Actress)
Crew:
Direction Woody Allen, Writing Woody Allen and Marshall
Brickman, Producing Charles H. Joffe, Music George Gershwin,
Cinematography Gordon Willis, Editing Susan E. Morse,
Production Design Mel Bourne, Set Direction Robert Drumheller,
Costume Design Albert Wolsky, Production Company Jack
Rollins & Charles H. Joffe Productions and United Artists,
Distributor United Artists Length: 96 minutes
|
|
Academy
Awards:
Nominated for Best Writing, Screenplay Written
Directly for the Screen (Woody Allen and Marshall Brickman)
· Nominated for Best Actress in a Supporting Role (Mariel
Hemingway)
Golden
Globes:
Nominated for Best Motion Picture - Drama
|
|
If Annie Hall and Alvy Singer were followed two years after
the end of their relationship that was documented in the film
bearing her name, their lives would very closely resemble
those of Isaac (Allen) and Mary (Keaton), two of the featured
characters in Manhattan. Like Isaac, Alvy would have
become even more cerebral, neurotic and convinced of his inferiority
through his observations of others actions spinning away from
him like the words of some sordid and comical novella. Like
Annie, Mary would have become more confident, knowledgeable
and opinionated yet somehow still subordinated under the weight
of more powerful men as demonstrated in her on again, off
again relationship with Isaac's married friend Yale (Michael
Murphy).
Taking its theme from the idea of a city symphony, Manhattan
is a lullaby to the eponymous city Isaac loves as the TV writer-turned-novelist
through whose eyes we know the film's world. In it we meet
the characters of Isaac's life including Yale and his wife
Emily (Anne Byrne), Isaac's 17-year old high school student
girlfriend, Tracy (Mariel Hemingway) and his ex-wife-turned-lesbian-memoirist
Jill (Meryl Streep).
Told
in linear fashion after a breathtakingly beautiful credit
sequence of Manhattanite images intercut to Gershwin's "Rhapsody
in Blue", the movie opens to a double date with Isaac and
Tracy hosting Yale and Emily for dinner and drinks. After
the meal Yale confesses his secret adultery with Mary to Isaac
who then happens to meet her a few days later while museum
trolling.
Immediately
smitten, Isaac begins sabotaging his relationship with Tracy
while simultaneously quitting his job as a TV writer to concentrate
on writing his first novel. Increasingly he becomes attracted
to Mary until Yale breaks off their romance thereby opening
the door for Isaac to become her lover.
Meanwhile
Jill is offered a publishing deal to write a tell-all book
about her adulthood outing and marriage to Isaac that has
him all in a dither about what might be exposed for public
consumption. He's troubled by her candor but he's also troubled
by the way Yale and Mary continue to have a deep hold on one
another that he can't seem to overtake.
Breaking
up with Tracy to concentrate on Mary, Isaac is burned when
Yale leaves Emily to resume his affair with her as well. He's
hurt and angry with his old friend sweeping away his new flame
but he finally feels rejuvenated when remembering Tracy's
innocent beauty only to find her but mere moments from leaving
the country to study abroad. As Yale and Mary begin anew,
Tracy looks forward to early adulthood and Jill's book turns
into a publishing phenomenon leaving Emily and Isaac to remain
alone.
While Isaac's reluctant maturation gives him greater clarity
he finds no comfort because the one thing he's always craving
in companionship is denied him just when he finally seems
ready to accept romantic responsibility. He's smitten but
unfulfilled, excited but well contained, happy yet somehow
left behind the changing tides of relationships being built
or crumbling all around him.
Even
so, Isaac's journey is a commitment to Manhattan through glimpses
of the cityscape in traveling shots of cars rolling along
highways, characters walking down sidewalks and static shots
captured through windows giving a sense of wild spaces in
the midst of urban containment and order. The film is a travelogue
of New York City's most well known borough complete with a
compelling, character-driven drama and plenty of good jokes.
Making itself a gem at 96 minutes running time nothing in
its duration requires omission or a look askance because of
overlong misfires or mistakes.
Though
Annie Hall was Allen's breakthrough film as far as
Academy voters and the movie going public were concerned,
Manhattan is his very best work up through the broadening
of his palette and the increasing number of his hits and misses
from the '80s onwards. It's a terribly funny movie with a
never ending banter of conversation and jokes that occasionally
tip the scales of self-immolation dangerously in the direction
of unseemly confession making Allen seem like both the film's
prime mover but also its embarrassingly personal subject.
The argument about how all Woody Allen movies are about Woody
Allen would do well to focus several dissertations on Manhattan
standing all by itself as the test case. In its length one
finds familiar Allen motifs like a fascination with sexual
performance, an antipathy towards arbitrary intellectual authority,
a celebration of the body, an ambivalence mixed with pride
on the subject of Jewish ethnicity, fear of powerful womanhood,
a pederast's fascination with youthful women and the setting
of New York City as the locus of anything and everything important.
His world is hermetically sealed with chance encounters, his
likes and dislikes and the culturally important artifacts
that play supporting roles in his career like aspects of an
authorial stamp.
Because Allen is a New York-based filmmaker, clarinetist and
writer, his movies involve the city he calls home and are
defined by it to a far greater degree than most any other
filmmaker in memory. It's not so much that he's incapable
of filming outside his preferred circumstances so much as
he seems disproportionately attached to the looming possibilities
of his home in a way that limits the appeal of his work while
also sharpening its focus.
Likely
this edge that both marginalizes his films and occasionally
makes them excellent stem from his being unconcerned with
the largest possible mainstream audience. Perhaps it's also
the result of Allen's artistic arrogance in producing work
for only a limited sliver of hardcore fans that will support
virtually anything he offers them. It might also be that his
films, aside from being his annual projects as writer, director
and star to keep himself busy and build up his personal fortune,
may also be the therapeutic method he most easily pursues
as an eccentric, talented and trouble-ridden man.
By now it's widely known how Allen and ex-wife Mia Farrow
conceived natural children while also expanding their family
through the unselfish practice of adoption. It must also be
widely known that Allen left Farrow in the early '90s for
one of his adopted children, Soon Yi Previn, then a painfully
young adult, which only gives the romance between Isaac and
Tracy an eerie prescience into the filmmaker's future libidinal
proclivities.
Of
course it's no consolation to his domestic partners and extended
family members but his interests, fascinations and personal
ticks have long been put on display in the rich body of work
he's left behind for us to enjoy. Although this kind of interpretation
through the lens of a moviemaker's filmography can lend itself
to false impressions or outright lies at the extreme, sometimes
it lends itself to a greater understanding of the filmmaker's
intent. Maybe it even proves how the act of creation can itself
be a kind of healing process like performance therapy.
All
this may be overstating the case about Woody Allen and his
corpus of films and TV specials but Manhattan is undeniably
one of the great American movies. Its technical accomplishments
and high level of craftsmanship is beyond dispute and begins
with its lack of original music in exchange for the liberal
use of Gershwin standards to enliven on-screen events and
give them new meaning. Gordon Willis's black and white cinematography
in the widescreen aspect ration further contributes to setting
and gives the actors ample space within which to yield their
stories.
Plus there are the charms of history's artifacts peppered
throughout the film to be noticed by the discerning eye. Little
details like the taxicabs we glimpse circa 1979 or references
to then-dominant politicians and public figures, the use of
rotary phones and answering services, the existence of now
bulldozed movie theaters and restaurants and the view of Manhattan
before the 1980s and '90s saw it recover from the severe economic
troubles of the mid '70s.
From the standpoint of the Oscars 1979 was the year of Kramer
vs. Kramer, also starring Meryl Streep, which ran against
All That Jazz, Apocalypse Now, Breaking Away and Norma
Rae for top honors. For my sense of revisionism Manhattan
was an easy candidate to fill this list of movies of the year
but it's also my suspicion that Academy voters were beginning
to tire of Allen's outsider sensibility. His disinterest in
attending their annual awards showcase, even to pick up his
earlier wins for Annie Hall, didn't go noticed and
still his work set the nomination process ablaze with distinction
for his writing and Hemingway's precocious performance.
Academy voters were beyond the charms of being impressed with
Allen's considerable wit that had already seen him win writing
nominations for Annie Hall, Interiors and Manhattan,
with a win for Annie Hall, alongside two directing
nominations for Annie Hall and Interiors, with
another win for Annie Hall, and one acting nomination
for Annie Hall. Despite his reserve and New Yorker's
sensibility the man who began the '70s as an outsider ended
the decade as part of the Hollywood establishment as firmly
fixed as Billy Wilder to whose accomplishments Allen's work
bears a striking resemblance.
By
singling out Manhattan as his best film of the '70s,
perhaps of all time, I mean to protect and affirm three things
at once. First, the picture's black and white glimpses of
Manhattan in 1979 are an historically important record
worth repeat viewing simply for recording the period's material
reality. Second, the film itself making these glimpses is
a treasure of screen entertainment. Third, the melancholic
comedy of Isaac's universe is memorable precisely because
its characters and situations remain legendary in their everyday
frailty yet obviously human when considering their sincere
struggle to find happiness.
Manhattan's lessons may not be quite universal but
they're certainly far from trivial or unimportant.
|